Facing Abuse

Exploring the effects of abuse and the tools that heal them.

Sunday Salon: The Number (and the number of books in my house!)


Yep, I’ve been fiddling with the themes all day. I really like the old green one, but it’s hard to read the comments because every other comment is against the green background instead of a white one. Plus, I found Teresa Jones’ very hip themes and had to grab some to play with! I really like this purple one with the trees. It’s very retro in a very modern way. I hope none of you were inconvenienced by coming by to get a faceful of black-on-blue or headerless or text-only bloggitude while I was checking out my options!

The Sunday Salon

The Number: A Completely Different Way To Think About the Rest Of Your Life

by Lee Eisenberg

I was very proud of myself because when this book caught my eye in a local bookstore recently, I raced down the street to check it out of the library first. I have had a lifelong habit of buying first and deciding later… often much later. In fact, over the past year and a half, I’ve gotten rid of at least three hundred books that I never read, or read and didn’t like enough to re-read, or never finished. A lot of this was codependent book-buying: I had so many books that I thought I should own, so that I could convince other people to read them. You know, Important Political Books that would make them see why they should think a certain way, usually about things like race in America or class in the 20th century or women in the workplace. And I had even more books that I thought I should own because, well, they seemed like “my” kind of books. I thought that they “proved” something about me – like that I had the right ideas about race or class or gender or sexuality or…. It took me years to look at why I actually owned them and accept that it clearly wasn’t for reading.

Those were the books that I wanted to want to read. There was a whole other category after that: books that I wanted to finish or to like. I wasn’t trusting my feelings about them. What if I got rid of one and then realized I desperately wanted to read it? What if I got rid of something that I didn’t know I would really like? Worst of all were the books that I really wasn’t sure about. All the ones that looked like they might be good, but which I had never gotten around to reading and didn’t feel that motivated to try. A whole lot of these were books that had seemed really exciting in the store, but which turned dull and uninspirational as soon as I got them home. Could it be that it was just the thrill of the chase, of picking out and spending tons of money on books, that made me want them in the first place?

Well, I was finally willing to face reality. And I still have hundreds of books. I’d say at this point they break down pretty much into 60% comfort books that I love to read over and over again, 30% books that I haven’t read and think I would really enjoy if I could bring myself to try them, and 10% reference sorts of books. I lean very heavily toward comfort reading, whether it’s books that I have read before or books I know I will love and am excited about trying. Facing a book that looks good when I flip through it, but which I know nothing about, is like trying to psych myself up to get into a cold swimming pool. Sure, most of the time I love it once I’m in there and can’t wait to go back, but it’s really hard to overcome that initial bump.

I guess it’s a kind of fear, fear of the cold plunge or the inhospitable novel. And thinking of it that way helps a lot. I can separate fear and reality; I know that there’s nothing I actually need to be afraid of in starting a new book, because I am also finally willing to put down a book that sucks instead of trying to struggle on through. If I refuse to buy into that bump of fear, I can see that I am just trying a new book on for size to see if it meets my needs. I can see that I have the power to make sure my reading needs get met; I’m not at the book’s mercy. And I like thinking of it from that angle, like I’m challenging the book to pull me in and give me what I want. It puts the power back in my hands, instead of giving me the illusion that I’m at the mercy of a bad book.

The Number was a good book, with some important information. It’s about the amount that we need to retire, about what different people do with retirement and how that is changing, about how different people save for retirement and how that is changing. One of the big points I took away with me, which he makes repeatedly, is that a whole lot of people don’t start thinking about planning for retirement until they are about 50 – and that for many people, that is way too late.

Eisenberg explains a wide range of ways that people fund their retirements, like increasingly rare pensions, chancy inheritance, possibly-chancier Social Security, and more. The Number is packed full of human interest stories: he profiles different people, even imaginary people, and visits Sun City to investigate how heavily it really traffics in polyester high-waisted pants and golf courses. He holds off for most of the book on any really detailed explanation of how to figure out how much you really need, saving that for the end. He does, however, talk at length about the professionals whose job it is to figure it out, what they do, and how they ended up doing it anyway.

I was confused for the first two-thirds or so of the book, because I expected more nuts and bolts about how to find “my number.” I thought there would be worksheets, checklists, formulas. I enjoyed the meandering trip through what other people have done, but it felt undirected. Once I accepted (acceptance again!) that Eisenberg just had a different idea of where the book should be going than I did, I got a lot more out of it – but I do think it should have done a little more work to tell the reader where we were going to go. A bigger problem, I think, was that even though he talked to a lot of different people with different Numbers and different plans and lifestyles, they were all solidly middle-class and above. The middle-class people tended to be older, with decades of continuous service at companies with nice pension plans; the younger people, who wouldn’t have had pensions, tended to have lucrative careers. Eisenberg also (like many people who write about finances) clearly doesn’t understand the emotional and psychological roots of binge-spending and not taking care of ourselves; he says a lot of good things about avoiding the debt spirals that we are urged into by credit card companies, but portrays compulsive debtors as both confusingly out of control and as being able to stop on (metaphorically speaking) a dime.

A book about how you probably aren’t saving enough for retirement and you might already be screwed doesn’t sound like an enjoyable, positive tome. But there was a lot of hope sprinkled throughout the storiesin the form of different saving, earning, and lifestyle options. And, most of all (to me), in our future longevity. According to Eisenberg, a lot of people who study health and longevity are projecting that people will be living to 150 even within our current lifespan – that is, we’ll be alive to see this happen, and maybe even to experience it ourselves. And they are starting to think that it’s likely humans will reach lifespans of 400 years, “joining the ranks of lobsters, sturgeons, sharks, alligators, and tortoises, all of which scientists classify as nonaging creatures. Gerontologist Leonard Hayflick explains that these species just keep growing, albeit more slowly over time. Physiological functions, while reaching a peak, don’t demonstrably decline as they age.” The financial flipside: we can no longer assume that we’ll only live a few years after retirement. People planning for, and even enjoying, retirement today must (at least for safety’s sake) assume that they will live to see at least 100.

It left me with a lot to think about, and feeling very glad to have read it at age 29 instead of, say, 49. I’ve always pictured “retirement” as an age where I am enjoying the continuation of a very flexible and lucrative career, writing books or giving keynote speeches for plenty of money as I choose to while I travel or play or do whatever I like, hopefully with excellent health. Eisenberg’s book gave me more information I needed about how to plan both for that and for other possibilities at once. I’d say it falls firmly into the categories of books I like to read, maybe even more than once, and books that I want to give away – to all my friends and relatives, so that they can be prepared too.

14 Comments to

“Sunday Salon: The Number (and the number of books in my house!)”

  1. On April 27th, 2008 at 1:10 am Mrs S | 50 Book Challenge Says:

    Hi – I’m new here via the Sunday Salon – I love the theme you have here – I spent mst of yesterday trying to fit a new theme to one of my other sites – but I’m going to check out the site you recommend as I’m not 100% happy with what I ended up with!

  2. On April 27th, 2008 at 3:51 am Sunday Salon | A facelift and a giveaway | 50 Book Challenge Says:

    […] World planning site and nearly drove myself crazy – then today, thanks to the Salon, I find that Danica was also giving her site a facelift and recommended a great site where I picked up this new […]

  3. On April 27th, 2008 at 4:59 am Julie Says:

    NICE new theme!

    I also lean heavily towards comfort re-reads. I bet my shelves have a similar percentage.

  4. On April 27th, 2008 at 6:30 am Ann (Table Talk) Says:

    Only as I had to start thinking about whether I had enough to fund my retirement did I really start to look at my book buying habits and decide that in future the library could do my book buying for me.

    Ann (Table Talk)’s last blog post at their site, http://web.mac.com/ann163125/Table_Talk/Table_Talk_Blog/Table_Talk_Blog.html: Another Sunday Salon

  5. On April 27th, 2008 at 12:43 pm danica Says:

    Oh, damn me: it looks like the plugin that lets people reply to a specific comment isn’t working with this theme. Why oh why is it all so complicated? And it’s not showing people’s last blog posts either. Maybe if I disable and reenable all the plugins….

    Well then, the old-fashioned way:

    Mrs S – thanks! I adore it. I am glad I can help other people find decent themes, too. So many of them that I’ve tried all look the same, or flat-out don’t work right, or leave out something I need. I’m learning a lot about creating themes by tweaking all of them tho! Someday I’ll probably end up designing my own.

    Julie: thanks! :-D Comfort re-reads are crucial. I think it’s a good mix :) It’s funny; my parents could never understand why I would want to read a book or watch a movie over again, because I already knew how it turned out. But I think it’s the experience that’s important, not the suspense!

  6. On April 27th, 2008 at 12:59 pm Julie Says:

    Yeah, the rereading thing is funny. Some people (like you & me) swear by it; others won’t even consider it because life is too short. My dad once interviewed me for 2 hours on this topic for a paper he was writing (he’s a psych prof).

    All right, I’m going to attempt to reply to the comment. :)

    Julie’s last blog post at their site, http://bookworm.pilcrow.biz: Sunday Salon: American Pastoral

  7. On April 27th, 2008 at 1:54 pm danica Says:

    hm, well, it all worked for you and I haven’t tried fixing anything yet. hooray! I’d love to read that paper. People have the funniest ideas ;)

  8. On April 27th, 2008 at 1:57 pm danica Says:

    Ann: Hee! We did it the opposite way from each other. Thank goodness for libraries!!

  9. On April 27th, 2008 at 3:50 pm dew Says:

    I’m afraid I can’t see the pictures you mentioned in my blog. I like the new look of your blog, though!

  10. On April 27th, 2008 at 5:28 pm danica Says:

    dew: thanks! here are links:



  11. On April 27th, 2008 at 7:21 pm Wisteria Says:

    I was worried I had too many books yet to read, but I think your 30% sounds about right. Anyway, you never want to run out of something to read. My biggest nightmare. Imagine the anxiety on top of anxiety.

    Wisteria’s last blog post at their site, bookwormsdinner.blogspot.com: Sunday Salon-Franklin and Lucy

  12. On April 28th, 2008 at 11:20 am danica Says:

    I hear that! But it’s not as bad as it seems. Now it’s just annoying to not have something I really want to read. Maybe I should blog about this stuff :)

  13. On April 29th, 2008 at 6:40 pm Facing Abuse » Blog Archive » Struggling with money Says:

    […] I do, however, make terrible impulsive purchases, especially at the bookstore and grocery store. I don’t really regret many of my book purchases, mind you. But I tend to go to the grocery store and freak out because I’m not sure whether I want this kind of juice or that kind of juice, and oh the yogurt looks good, and hm, now I don’t really want the cheese I came here to buy but I should get it cause I was already going to, and I end up getting both of the juices so I won’t have to choose and the yogurt even though I don’t really want it because what if I get home and I really DO want it and then I’m sad! […]

  14. On May 9th, 2008 at 9:41 pm Facing Abuse » Blog Archive » Weekly Geeks 2: Son of Book Reviews Says:

    […] linking to other people’s reviews of a book I’ve reviewed. Like, if you blogged about The Number: A Completely Different Way To Think About The Rest Of Your Life, you could tell me and I would say “Hey! Somebody else wrote about this too, look at […]

Email will not be published

Website example

Your Comment:


Fatal error: Cannot redeclare class Akismet in /home/khouse/eft/blog/wp-content/plugins/wassup/lib/akismet.class.php on line 389